We built this questionnaire so every CMO in the CMO Huddles community can get a data-backed snapshot of how “go-to-market ready” their organization really is, without a week-long workshop or a six-figure consultant invoice.
Submit the form → 2 mins
Book a 60-minute chat with a Belkins client strategist & outreach specialist
In the 60-minute “data lab,” you bring last-quarter funnel metrics and we feed them into Belkins’ model to generate a TAM heat map, channel-fit scorecard, and 90-day quick-win roadmap—visuals we package into a board-ready PDF within 72 hours.
Any CMO who must defend budget allocations or pressure-test gut instinct, new in seat, hunting a funding round, or locking the annual plan walks away with a data-centric narrative that turns “I think” into “the numbers prove.
Receive your tailored assessment plan
PDF + live walkthrough so you can start deploying quick wins right away.
Our Market Readiness Assessment (MRA) turns raw inputs into a board-ready game-plan. In one PDF and a live walkthrough, you’ll get:
In other words, the assessment doesn’t just tell you how “ready” you are—it hands you the talking points, numbers, and next-step options you need to steer a productive discussion with your board, CEO, or CRO about which marketing channels will unlock the biggest share of TAM given your current ICP, budget, and resourcing constraints.
‼️MARKET READINESS ASSESSMENT SAMPLE ‼️
Ideal Client Profile (ICP) Deep-Dive
You give us your current ICP; we pressure-test it.
Total Addressable Market (TAM) Sizing
ICP Refinement & Expansion Framework
Channel Mapping & Cross-Channel Fit Test
Quick-Wins vs. Long-Shots Program Grid
Opportunity Analysis & Benchmarks
Deliverable | Why it matters |
---|---|
TAM report (counts & $) | Sets realistic growth ceilings |
Refined ICP matrix | Focuses budget on best-fit buyers |
Channel fit scorecard | Shows where to double-down or cut spend |
Quick-Win playbook | Revenue pops you can action in a month |
Long-Shot roadmap | Strategic bets with ROI timelines |
Benchmark pack | Apples-to-apples view vs. peers |